Not sure about python, but throughout my career I had to work with MISRA C standardisation for critical systems. There is more and more that is handled by python that also needs to go through validation. I wonder if there's value in that?
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 at 18:40, Dan Stromberg <drsali...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > What would it take to create an ANSI, ECMA and/or ISO standard for Python? > > It seems to have really helped C. > > It looks like Java isn't standardized, and it's done OK, though perhaps it > was healthier in the past - before Oracle decided API's were ownable. > > I think standardizing Python might be really good for controlling its growth > and avoiding featuritis. > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/JZYW4JOTANYIOLYDQ6YHRUP2TWO52OAE/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ -- Kind regards, Stefano Borini _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/NR3UAEPEUJCWDBQVQW3QN4JYZWZNR2IU/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
