On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 12:02 AM Paul Sokolovsky <pmis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think to resolve this issue to the completion, and avoid possibility > of an intermediary to add any unexpected changes/mistakes to the > original sources, instead of "someone making a tarball", someone should > make a script, which reproduces making a tarball. Then such a script > can be reviewed and tarball reproduced independently (e.g., by the > admins of python.org). > > That's exactly what I did, and attached it to the ticket above: > https://github.com/python/pythondotorg/issues/1734#issuecomment-781129337 > > For extra details, copying my comment there: > > --- > I attach my version of such a script (and also paste it below for > reference, but if you use it, please use the attached version to avoid > any discrepancies due to copy-paste). > I got a version to build, but what's supposed to be in patchlevel.h? It was just an int, but that was confusing gcc. I commented out its #include, and things seemed to work without it. The patches I used are at https://stromberg.dnsalias.org/svn/cpythons/trunk/python0.9/exportable-patches Sadly, it doesn't work that well with my "pythons" script ( https://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/pythons/), because 0.9.1's interpreter doesn't have a -c option.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/XAKEELGLCWOVW77F4PV2S6MYSC7YFXZR/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
