Hello, On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 19:47:04 +0000 Barry Scott <ba...@barrys-emacs.org> wrote:
> > On 22 Feb 2021, at 10:15, Paul Sokolovsky <pmis...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > It looks like: > > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "pseudoc_tool.py", line 91, in <module> > > File ".../xforms.py", line 25, in print > > TypeError: unexpected keyword argument 'noann' > > > > - that makes clear that it's "print" function of "xforms.py" module, > > line 25, which got an unexpected keyword argument. > > You are proposing to fake a stack frame that I have to know is not a > stack frame but is in fact the location of the function in the > exception? No, I'm proposing to stop faking lack of the last stack frame due to CPython's implementation details. See the original message for more info. > I'm -1 on that as its confusing. > > Having checked that its python code and not a C extension function > you could use the info in fn.__code__ to get the filename and line of > where the function is defined and put that info into the exception. Could use crystal ball, even. > > Example of the info: > | >>> os.path.join.__code__ > <code object join at 0x7fb19aebc7c0, file > "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.9/lib/python3.9/posixpath.py", > line 71> > > I use repr(fn.__code__) a lot when debugging complex code. > > Barry > -- Best regards, Paul mailto:pmis...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/FB65TFWGZEBENGT3W2X7RBPY63RINU25/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
