> On Mar 10, 2021, at 4:45 PM, David Mertz <me...@gnosis.cx> wrote: > > In contrast, the "master" used in version control directly borrows from > so-called "master/slave network architecture." I saw in this thread one > implausible argument that it was intended in the sense of "magister." I don't > believe it, but even if we stipulate that whoever first used the word in > relation to version control meant that, nearly everyone else who discusses it > means "master/slave."
I don't think it derives from "master/slave network architecture.”. I think it derives from the use of “master” to denote an instance or prototype that is used to create identical copies or replicas, a usage that predates networking, as in master tape, master print, and, (perhaps archaically for you :)), mimeograph master. Irrelevantly, I also think all (almost all?) uses of "master/slave” to describe network architectures are lazy; there is a better existing description, e.g. “active/passive”, “polling” etc. Jonathan P.S. My preference would be “mainline” over “main”. I like railroad version diagrams. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/DONBBIFH7LESW3D7JSB4IC5Y7GAFSFGQ/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
