On Wed, 31 Mar 2021, 3:15 am Barry Warsaw, <[email protected]> wrote: > . We would like to eventually go farther, including deprecation of pth > files entirely, but that is outside the scope of this PEP. >
Please don't, since that would force everyone to start using PEP 648 just to extend sys.path, which would be just as bad as the status quo. Cheers, Nick. >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/MSOV7NKDCO7L3X46SDDLVTUEN7ER2EDB/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
