> On 4 Apr 2021, at 11:34, Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/4/21 4:44 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
>>
>> Unless the mistake was just introduced, the mistake would have happened. One
>> this severe would likely have been caught within the week or two before a
>> final. But as Łukasz noted when announcing the change, .rcs are generally
>> ignored.
>
> Well, that's not true. I think for at least the past 3.8 and current 3.9
> cycle
> I always tested the release candidates, and built them for various Linux
> architectures. And I'm filing issues marked as 'released-blocker' when I see
> regressions introduced, it's up to the release managers to determine if such
> changes are intended or not.
Can you show us an example of a release-blocker issue you reported?
- Ł
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/UOSUV632CJXZE3GCUPC6CWVBGS4KNEZY/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
