On 4/4/21 2:15 AM, Mark Shannon wrote:
Calling something a "reference" implementation suggests that it is something that people can refer to, that is near
perfectly correct and fills in the gaps in the specification.
That is a high standard, and one that is very difficult to attain.
Indeed. I don't think even the CPython reference implementation achieves that standard -- unless we have vastly
different ideas on what "near perfectly correct" means.
--
~Ethan~
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/ED52ZC2NDNQQS6SQI3LJ4YQTDC5TWC6C/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
