Thanks for this PEP! Most of these proposals would make for useful improvements to the language. I have a few pieces of feedback below.
El mar, 13 abr 2021 a las 14:14, Ethan Furman (<et...@stoneleaf.us>) escribió: > This PEP has been deferred until Python 3.9 at the earliest, as the open > This should be 3.10 at least (and even that is pushing it by now). > > While this does create some duplication, there are valid reasons for it: > > * the ``bchr`` builtin is to recreate the ``ord``/``chr``/``unichr`` trio > from > Python 2 under a different naming scheme (however, see the Open > Questions > section below) > * the class method is mainly for the ``bytearray.fromord`` case, with > ``bytes.fromord`` added for consistency > > > I don't see an "Open questions" section in this email (only an "Open issues" section talking about memoryview). I don't find the argument for a builtin very persuasive. Why is it important to recreate the Python 2 trio? `bchr` is a more obscure name than `bytes.fromord`. `bytes.fromord` is already short and doesn't require an import, so we don't gain that much from the separate builtin.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/V7O7RGOL2QT73VZJFMPVZAAIZUKXZW72/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
