Hello,

I'm a bit surprised that this topic is brought up just days before the
feature freeze of Python 3.10.  How did tools work until now with from
future import annotations? This feature has been in the language for years
(since 3.7), and I haven't heard until today anyone complaining about this
feature gap. Did everyone just told users not to use lazy evaluation of
type hints until now? Also there's been advertised for at least a year that
next python will make it default 🤔

Thanks,

Bernat

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021, 23:13 Paul Bryan <pbr...@anode.ca> wrote:

> I've been working on a similar framework, Fondat [1], that shares similar
> objectives as Pydantic and FastAPI, albeit implementing in a different
> manner.
>
> I believe other frameworks will have to "run a gauntlet" (as I already
> have)  to deal with the affects of PEP 563. If anyone on these teams are
> interested in how I've dealt with such issues, please feel free to contact
> me directly.
>
> I also recommend members of these teams monitor and/or participate in the
> typing-sig (and maybe the python-dev) mailing list, as discussions in these
> lists are likely to affect their work in the future.
>
> Paul
>
> [1] https://github.com/fondat/fondat-core
>
>
> On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 17:49 -0400, Paul Ganssle wrote:
>
> I should point out that "accept PEP 649" and "break pydantic" are not the
> only options here. The thing that will break pydantic is the end of PEP
> 563's deprecation period, not a failure to implement PEP 649.
>
> Other viable options include:
>
> - Leave PEP 563 opt-in until we can agree on a solution to the problem.
> - Leave PEP 563 opt-in forever.
> - Deprecate PEP 563 and go back to status quo ante.
>
> I haven't followed this closely enough — if PEP 649 were accepted today,
> would it even be ready for use before the 3.10 code freeze (which is in a
> few weeks)?
>
> Assuming this is a real problem (and based in part on how long it took
> for attrs to get what support it has for PEP 563
> <https://github.com/python-attrs/attrs/issues/288>, I wouldn't be
> surprised if PEP 563 is quietly throwing a spanner in the works in several
> other places as well), my vote is to leave PEP 563 opt-in until at least
> 3.11 rather than try to rush through a discussion on and implementation of
> PEP 649.
>
> Best,
> Paul
> On 4/15/21 4:20 PM, Bluenix wrote:
>
> Please accept PEP 649!
>
>
> Python's type hinting has become so much more useful than originally thought, 
> and without this change much of that will be hindered. For example (you 
> already know about Pydantic and FastAPI) 
> [discord.py](https://github.com/Rapptz/discord.py)'s commands system allows 
> you to use typehinting to specify how arguments should be converted. Take the 
> following code:
>
>
> ```py
>
> import discord
>
> from discord.ext import commands
>
>
> bot = commands.Bot(command_prefix='>')
>
>
> @bot.command()
>
> # discord.py reads the typehints and converts the arguments accordingly
>
> async def reply(ctx, member: discord.Member, *, text: str):  # ctx is always 
> passed
>
>     await ctx.send(f'{member.mention}! {text}')
>
>
> bot.run('token')
>
> ```
>
>
> I must say, this is extremely ergonomic design! Don't break it :)
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
>
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
>
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
>
> Message archived at 
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/S2O7SE4QZQARAYSCOT7PQUEPNENHDJTQ/
>
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/GT2HQDH2HOZFSOTA5LHTFL5OV46UPKTB/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/PBGFXPC7D3NFLJSFQBDAQQCW6JCMVCFC/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/7KU4WMWD3U6AFVDFOGVZER4QWZJFPAB4/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to