On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 2:25 PM Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org> wrote:
> This is not to say that, in the fullness of time, those objects should > never have annotations. Even in the three random types I picked in my > example, there's at least one example: float.imag is a data member and > might theoretically be annotated. But we can certainly kick this can down > the road too. Maybe by the time we get around to it, we'll have a > read-only dictionary we can use for the purpose. > We already have one -- the mappingproxy type you get back from a class' __dict__ attribute. (Though in the fullness of times, type objects presumably won't be shared between multiple interpreters, which solves the problem in a different way.) -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) *Pronouns: he/him **(why is my pronoun here?)* <http://feministing.com/2015/02/03/how-using-they-as-a-singular-pronoun-can-change-the-world/>
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/JXJQ76AUSI5U7JOB5G4AAGPVAKWDFR6U/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
