On Tue, 29 Jun 2021, 12:45 am Ethan Furman, <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
> On 6/28/21 6:54 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > > * Enum repr() changing back to the historical behaviour, unless you opt > in to the > > new behaviour with the global enum decorator: definite +1 here > > Question for Nick: this behavior is currently in place for stdlib > enumerations, and has been since beta 0; are you > saying this change should also be put off to 3.11 ? > I'm not sure what you mean by "this change". I don't think the change to make repr() less informative for IntEnum instances should be done in any version. > I think repr() should continue to show both the symbolic name and the associated numeric value, as it did in 3.9 (I'm not worried about the exact spelling, though, I just don't want to have to find and look up a translation table when debugging). Did I misunderstand the proposed change for the next beta? Cheers, Nick. > -- > ~Ethan~ > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/AVNMYCH5PZ7CI6COY6NEZKSXO4VV56CA/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/XKQKPTZBWDXM7DS6RMBT4ADKCLHWWRCT/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
