On 2/19/06, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You are missing the rationale of the PEP process. The point is > > *not* documentation. The point of the PEP process is to channel > > and collect discussion, so that the BDFL can make a decision. > > The BDFL is not bound at all to the PEP process. > > > > To document things, we use (or should use) documentation. > > > > > One could wish this ideal had been the case for the import extensions > defined in PEP 302.
(A bit off-topic, but that hit home, so I'll reply...) Agreed, and it's my fault they weren't, to some extent. I did try to find a suitable place, but the import docs are generally fairly scattered, and there wasn't a particularly good place to put the changes. Any suggestions would be gratefully accepted... Paul. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
