Hi all,

I have submitted PEP 667 as an alternative to PEP 558.
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0667/

Nick and I have agreed to disagree on the way to fix locals() and f_locals. We are both in agreement that it needs fixing.

In summary, PEP 667 has roughly the same surface behavior as PEP 558 but is simpler and more consistent internally, at the expense of some minor C API backwards incompatibility issues.

PEP 558 also has backwards incompatibility issues, but claims to be more compatible at the C API level.

Cheers,
Mark.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/4RH5YCXIHIP6MRVTCOKOOO4GKCIMH4GJ/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to