On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 18:55:04 +1000
Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> P.S. The fact that it *didn't* look like the inverse operation for
> `int.from_bytes` was one advantage of calling the method
> `bytes.fromord` instead of `bytes.fromint`, but I'm still happy the SC
> is right that `bytes.fromint` is a more comprehensible method name
> overall.

Perhaps we can call it `bytes.byte` to make it unambiguous?

Regards

Antoine.


_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/WZUPBP4UASRCJLAKP6FMQJLLMYJY22CL/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to