The current restrictions will also confuse some users (e.g. those used to bash, and IIRC JS, where the rules are similar as what Pablo is proposing).
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:24 AM Terry Reedy <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9/20/2021 7:18 AM, Pablo Galindo Salgado wrote: > > > there are some interesting things we **could** (emphasis on could) get > > out of this and I wanted > > to discuss what people think about them. > > > > * The parser will allow nesting quote characters. This means that we > > **could** allow reusing the same quote type in nested expressions > > like this: > > > > f"some text { my_dict["string1"] } more text" > > I believe that this will disable regex-based processing, such as syntax > highlighters, as in IDLE. I also think that it will be sometimes > confusing to human readers. > > -- > Terry Jan Reedy > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/TWSJKE4KKSW7YD3OCHKGKJC52VUG6FY5/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) *Pronouns: he/him **(why is my pronoun here?)* <http://feministing.com/2015/02/03/how-using-they-as-a-singular-pronoun-can-change-the-world/>
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/FAYGYTKQACEOXVDAT44CBW75PZ4MKLJZ/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
