On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 09:49:10AM -0400, Larry Hastings wrote: > It's an debatable point since "from future" behavior is always off by > default. I'd certainly agree that libraries /should/ support stringized > annotations by now, considering they were nearly on by default in 3.10. > But I wouldn't say stringized annotations were a "standard" part of > Python, yet. As yet they are optional. Optional things aren't > standard, and standard things aren't optional.
You misunderstand me. I'm not referring to PEP 563, which is still optional and requires the user to opt-in with a future import. I'm referring to the *manual* use of strings for forward references, which has been part of type-hinting since PEP 484 way back in 2014. https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0484/#forward-references I expect that people were using strings for forward references before PEP 484, but it was 484 that made it official. -- Steve _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/NGW3E43JXZ4N25GPXZIMSIAKHSMHUTSA/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
