Yeah, making the body optional (without looking at decorators) is not acceptable either. Too easy to do by mistake (I still do this All. The. Time. :-)
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 2:19 PM <asleep.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > My proposal wasn't to make the body optional based on the presence of a > decorator, but rather to return a "function prototype" iff the body does > not exist (I probably should have made my made my own reply instead of > piggybacking on his proposal). I also mentioned some form of expression to > represent this, similar to lambda. Maybe a friendly error message telling > the user to use a function when this thing is called would alleviate some > confusion? I'm not sure how one would forget to add the function body > anyway. > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/3HJY6VGLIWRJ7F4BZBNGNCSJJTXH3CVM/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) *Pronouns: he/him **(why is my pronoun here?)* <http://feministing.com/2015/02/03/how-using-they-as-a-singular-pronoun-can-change-the-world/>
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/6OCPFRM5UCRTUOZ2KFMG6ZV4XMS3YNJD/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
