Victor Stinner schrieb am 03.02.22 um 22:46:
Oh right, Cython seems to be a false positive.A code search found 3 references to __Pyx_PyObject_LookupSpecial(): PYPI-2022-01-26-TOP-5000/Cython-0.29.26.tar.gz: Cython-0.29.26/Cython/Compiler/ExprNodes.py: lookup_func_name = '__Pyx_PyObject_LookupSpecial' PYPI-2022-01-26-TOP-5000/Cython-0.29.26.tar.gz: Cython-0.29.26/Cython/Compiler/Nodes.py: code.putln("%s = __Pyx_PyObject_LookupSpecial(%s, %s); %s" % ( PYPI-2022-01-26-TOP-5000/Cython-0.29.26.tar.gz: Cython-0.29.26/Cython/Utility/ObjectHandling.c: static CYTHON_INLINE PyObject* __Pyx_PyObject_LookupSpecial(PyObject* obj, PyObject* attr_name) { Oh, that's not "_PyObject_LookupSpecial()", it doesn't use the _Py_Identifier type: static CYTHON_INLINE PyObject* __Pyx_PyObject_LookupSpecial(PyObject* obj, PyObject* attr_name) { ... }
Correct. We (intentionally) have our own way to intern strings and do not depend on CPython's identifier framework.
Stefan _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/4ATP4FSVRNI5CLAJDN43QRDH5IHW7BW2/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
