Phillip J. Eby wrote: > At 03:49 PM 2/23/2006 +1300, Greg Ewing wrote: >>Steven Bethard wrote: >> > And, as you mention, it's consistent >> > with the relative import feature. >> >>Only rather vaguely -- it's really somewhat different. >> >>With imports, .foo is an abbreviation for myself.foo, >>where myself is the absolute name for the current module, >>and you could replace all instances of .foo with that. > > Actually, "import .foo" is an abbreviation for "import myparent.foo", not > "import myparent.myself.foo".
Actually, "import .foo" won't work anyway. nitpicking-ly yours, Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
