If you want any kind of traction on this I recommend filing an opinionated issue on this (explaining why the current behavior is wrong).
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 1:25 PM <dw-...@d-woods.co.uk> wrote: > Daniel Moisset wrote: > > I might expect that in a "case D(something=__y)" you get the mangling for > > __y, but I'm not sure what the implementation does now and I'm writing > from > > my phone > > Yes - that case does what you'd expect. > > Thanks for the reply. > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/3BALIBTV3ATAEC6G5ZJKAFBASZG4B5AP/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) *Pronouns: he/him **(why is my pronoun here?)* <http://feministing.com/2015/02/03/how-using-they-as-a-singular-pronoun-can-change-the-world/>
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/BX2QX3GUOGMBL5TGSSN7EQFJQHA6UQJM/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
