Greg Ewing wrote:
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>> I wouldn't mind seeing one of the early ideas from PEP 340 being
>> resurrected some day, such that the signature for the special method
>> was "__next__(self, input)" and for the builtin "next(iterator,
>> input=None)"
>
> Aren't we getting an argument to next() anyway?
> Or was that idea dropped?
PEP 342 opted to extend the generator API instead (using "send") and leave the
iterator protocol alone for the time being.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
