Guido van Rossum wrote: > In which context did you find a need for defining a static method and > calling it inside the class definition? I'm guessing that what you're > playing dubious scoping games.
I'm not. I almost never use staticmethod actually. I find them not very pythonic, in my humble own definition of pythonic. But since staticmethod is a standard built-in, I considered valid the question of a programmer relatively new to Python (but obviously appreciating its dynamic nature) wondering why calling a static method inside a class definition doesn't work. A use case is not hard to imagine, especially a private static method called only to build a class attribute. I don't know the philosophy behind making staticmethod a built-in (instead of a function in a module only used in specific occasions), but my guess was that what is normal scoping/regrouping in Java/C++/C# was worth common use support in Python. But your comment about "dubious scoping games" makes me think I, again, didn't guess right;) So yes, I'm proposing something I'll probably never use, but I think would make Python more "welcoming". Regards, Nicolas _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
