On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 01:43:00AM -0600, Tim Peters wrote: > I'm optimistic, because the new test compares a quantity already being > tested by the macro, a second time against 0, and it's hard to get > cheaper than that. However, the new branch isn't predictable, so who > knows?
When compiling with gcc at least you could give the compiler a hint, eg http://kerneltrap.org/node/4705 > For example, in a release build on WinXP, VM size is about 48MB at the > "full" prompt, and drops to 3MB at the "empty" prompt. In the trunk > (without this patch), VM size falls relatively little from what it is > at the "full" prompt Excellent work! -- Nick Craig-Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://www.craig-wood.com/nick _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
