Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> What you presumably meant was "what would you consider the proper type
> for (P)CDATA?"
No, I mean the whole thing, including all the <...> tags
etc. Like you see when you load an XML file into a text
editor. (BTW, doesn't the fact that you *can* load an
XML file into what we call a "text editor" say something?)
> nobody but authors of
> wire drivers[2] and introspective code will need to _explicitly_ call
> .encode('base64').
Even a wire driver writer will only need it if he's
trying to turn a text wire into a binary wire, as
far as I can see.
--
Greg
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
