[Tim] >> Doesn't look like Guido responded, so I'll channel him and declare >> that he intended to agree with me after all ;-)
[Guido] > It was so obvious that you were right I didn't bother to agree at the > time. But yes, I agree. Of course you do. It was obvious to you, and therefore-- as your professional channeler --it was also obvious to me. For some inscrutable reason, though, others tend to imagine looming disasters in silence, instead of just plucking your comforting thoughts from the aether ;-) > And I swear on a stack of Python 1.5.2 language reference manuals that you > didn't have to twist my arm. :-) Indeed! But whose arm could we twist to get them to repair the compiler in 2.4? I'd settle for a blurb in the next 2.4 NEWS just noting that 2.5 will follow the documented syntax. That may even be desirable, to avoid breaking working (albeit by accident) code across a micro release. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
