"Michael Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Another nice thing about having a next() built-in is that it makes > getting the first item of a generator expression a lot more elegant, > I think this: > next(item for item in items if item > 3) > is a lot clearer than this: > (item for item in items if item > 3).next() > or alternatives that would break this into multiple statements. > [inspired by a recent python-list question]
Yuck. This bug-prone one-liner was an answer to the question: how do I (the OP) get just the first item of items meeting a conditiion instead of all, as with filter, with a one-line expression instead of the obvious for loop. Bad question; bad answer. As I pointed out, this 'solution' raises StopIteration if there is no first valid item. That in turn crashes the program unless one adds more lines to deal with the possible exception. In the same post, I also suggested the OP first define his desired no-item behavior (not answered that I have seen). To me, one-liner-itis can entertain, but also distract from complete, correct coding. Terry Jan Reedy _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
