| [ Raymond Hettinger ]: | > If someone really cared about the double lookup, they could | > flatten a level by starting their modules with: | > | > from __builtin__ import * | > | > However, we don't see people writing this kind of code. That | > could mean that the double lookup hasn't been a big concern.
[ Steven Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]: ---------------------------------------- | It could mean that. I think what you are suggesting is sufficiently | cleaver that the average Python coder may not have thought of it. | | # small cut | | And the "from __builtin__ import *" additionally imposes a startup | cost and memory cost (at least a word per builtin, I would guess). I suppose that if someone decided to use "from __builtin__ import *" to avoid double lookup, this person *knows* what builtins should be optmized, and therefore could use import specific builtins "from __builtin__ import len, max" avoiding a startup/memory penalty. Otherwise, the startup/memory penalty might be non-issues. cheers, Rod Senra _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
