Fredrik Lundh wrote: > I don't think many people embed setup.py scripts, so alternative (e) would > pro- > bably cause the least problems: > > e) sys.executable contains the full path to the program used to invoke > this interpreter instance, or None if this could not be determined.
It seems that you indeed are trying to solve a problem you encountered. Can you please explain what the problem is? ISTM that the current definition doesn't really cause problems, despite potentially being fuzzy. People that start sys.executable typically *do* get a Python interpreter - in an embedded interpreter, they just don't want to start a new interpreter, as that couldn't work, anyway. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
