On Fri, Mar 17, 2006, Georg Brandl wrote: > Greg Ewing wrote: >> Russell E. Owen wrote: >>> >>> Another thing that would be *really* useful is to list the actual >>> built-in types with the category. For example: >>> Sequence Types (str, unicode, list, tuple, buffer, xrange) >>> Mapping Types (dict) >> >> +1 > > If I understand correctly what you mean, that's already done.
Partially, by my standard. That is, the names of the types are now listed, but you still have to drill down two layers to get to the string methods. -- Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "19. A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing." --Alan Perlis _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
