On Tuesday 28 March 2006 17:53, Neal Norwitz wrote: > In order to do the best possible job and avoid silly errors, there > shouldn't be any checkins which could change behaviour that do not > include a test. I'm not talking about updating comments or string > constants. But even trivial changes can cause regressions or > incompatible changes. Just like failing tests, code checked in > without tests is fair game for being reverted if there is anything > questionable.
+1 from me. Anyone disagree? Anthony -- Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It's never too late to have a happy childhood. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
