Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/28/06, Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It might be worth instead adding an option flag to the executable that > > implies > > "from the loaded module, run __main__() with sys.argv as its argument(s)", > > so > > the user can get this behaviour with `python -X somemodule.py`. > > You can do "python -m somemodule" as long as somemodule.py uses the if > __name__=='__main__' convention. What does your proposal add?
Well, it's not really my proposal. I'm just suggesting the behaviour in PEP299 could be added via a commandline option so that it doesn't introduce backward-incompatibility. I don't see any particular benefit to PEP299 myself -- I'd rather just add an entry to the style guide about standardizing the "executable stanza" and main() function. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://pyropus.ca/software/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com