[Thomas Wouters]
>> So does that make all cycles involving only objects with finalizers
>> impervious to cycle-gc? I guess it'd have to be that way.
[again]
> Er, I meant to say 'does that make all cycles involving just one object with
> a finalizer impervious to cycle-gc'.
Both are true, and both are implied by this sharper variant:
all cycles containing at least one object with a finalizer [etc]
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
