Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 18:24 -0500, Phillip J. Eby wrote: > > > On the plus side, it sounds like ASPW is a more general wrapping of SQLite, > > which seems to me to lean in its favor for the stdlib, if it can also be > > brought into DBAPI compliance. > > If there's some general uncertainty about which to add, then it might > make better sense to wait and not add either for Python 2.5.
I'm not sure that there is uncertainty about *which* to add. So far we've seen a handful of +1s for pysqlite, but a link and short discussion about aspw. In my opinion, because pysqlite already has a DBAPI compliant interface to sqlite, and of us who have used it have had positive experiences, I don't see how aspw is even competition, let alone influential enough to push the adoption of an embedded SQL server to Python 2.6 or later. - Josiah _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
