Bill Janssen wrote: >> I think short names are more more consistent with the existing naming in >> the standard library. > > Which doesn't make it a good idea. +1 on adding longer top-level > package names as aliases for existing shorter top-level package names.
Which existing short names do you have in mind? os? xml? email? Let's not get excited over names here. I say: let the RM or the BDFL, whoever feels responsible to pronounce whether PySQLite actually gets in, decide which name it will have. Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
