On 3/29/06, Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/29/06, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > from a user perspective, adding this to the standard library is a > > no-brainer. > > the only reason not to add it would be if the release managers don't have > > time to sort out the build issues. > > Agreed. As a SQL user, it feels like a no-brainer to me, as well. I'd > love to see a DB-API compliant module, and an embedded SQL database, > in the core. I don't believe that there's anything comparable to > (py)sqlite on that score. > > And as Anthony pointed out, it provides a nice upgrade path to > "bigger" SQL/DB-API solutions. > > +1 from me.
+1 here, too; just as /f said, the only real issue is time (as in, is it too late to get such a package into 2.5), but with the volunteering I've seen that should be feasible. I just hope we get a BDFL +1 soon so I can add the good news to the 2nd ed of "Python in a Nutshell", which is due to go "printers-wards" about 8-9 days from now (in order to be ready for OSCON -- the times from final text version to paper are NOT brief:-). Alex _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
