Fredrik Lundh wrote: > Anthony Baxter wrote: > > >>>Such a module name is less likely to cause problems. >> >>Excellent point. Hm. Maybe we should just go with 'sqlite', instead. > > > except that "sqlite" was the name used by the first pysqlite > generation: > > $ python2.3 > >>>>import sqlite >>>>sqlite.version > > '1.1.6' > > I'm not sure how much trouble reusing this name would cause, but I'm > quite sure the amount of trouble is larger than "none at all".
"sqlitedb" is not taken yet. -- Gerhard _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
