Tim Peters wrote: > We already endure lots of pain to ensure that a weakref callback that > gets executed (not all do) can't see anything that looks like trash.
Okay, so would it be possible for a generator that needs finalisation to set up a weakref callback, suitably rooted somewhere so that the callback is reachable, that references enough stuff to clean up after the generator, without referencing the generator itself? -- Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | Carpe post meridiam! | Christchurch, New Zealand | (I'm not a morning person.) | [EMAIL PROTECTED] +--------------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
