On Thu, Apr 06, 2006, Greg Ewing wrote: > Fredrik Lundh wrote: >> >> it's not new code, and having *different* module names for the same >> well-established library isn't very nice to anyone. >> >>> Modules should have short, lowercase names, without underscores. > > But if we don't start becoming stricter about the naming of things > added to the stdlib, consistency of naming is never going to improve. > > Or should this wait for Py3k?
For contributions that are also maintained separately from Python, I think compatibility with the external code has to have some importance. I vote we wait for Py3k. -- Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "Look, it's your affair if you want to play with five people, but don't go calling it doubles." --John Cleese anticipates Usenet _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
