Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I think it's fine as it is. I don't think making it walk the
> inheritance tree is helpful; the output would be too large. Also, an
> instance doesn't have any code and that's fine too.
Inheritance has nothing to do with that.
> (Didn't you mean "dis.dis(D) doesn't touch C"?)
No.
> On 4/6/06, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> dis.dis currently handles new-style classes stepmotherly: given
>>
>> class C(object):
>> def Cm(): pass
>> class D(object):
>> def Dm(): pass
>>
>> dis.dis(C) doesn't touch D, and
>> dis.dis(C()) doesn't touch anything.
>>
>> Should it be fixed? It may need some reworking in dis.dis.
Here is an example transcript to make clearer what I mean:
Python 2.4.2 (#1, Mar 12 2006, 00:14:41)
>>> import dis
>>> class C:
... def Cm(): pass
... class D:
... def Dm(): pass
...
>>> dis.dis(C)
Disassembly of Cm:
2 0 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
3 RETURN_VALUE
Disassembly of D:
Disassembly of Dm:
4 0 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
3 RETURN_VALUE
>>> dis.dis(C())
Disassembly of Cm:
2 0 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
3 RETURN_VALUE
Disassembly of D:
Disassembly of Dm:
4 0 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
3 RETURN_VALUE
>>> class Co(object):
... def Cm(): pass
... class Do(object):
... def Dm(): pass
...
>>> dis.dis(Co)
Disassembly of Cm:
2 0 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
3 RETURN_VALUE
>>> dis.dis(Co())
>>>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
