Georg Brandl wrote: > Seo Sanghyeon wrote: >> Can someone have a look at #860326? I got bitten by it today, and I can >> see no reason not to apply suggested patch. > > I've reviewed it and checked it in.
Hm. This broke a few doctests. I can fix them, but I wonder if doctest should accept a bare exception name if the exception is defined in the current module. Or should it ignore the module name altogether? (Background: In normal exception tracebacks, non-builtin exceptions are printed with their module name prepended: Traceback: [...] decimal.InvalidOperation: ... When formatted by traceback.format_exception_only, the module name was omitted, which the patch mentioned above corrected. Since doctest relies on that behavior, three stdlib doctests broke.) Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
