On 4/14/06, Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 14 April 2006 02:31, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > > Tim Peters wrote: > > >> I'm not the one to decide, but at some time the traceback module > > >> should be rewritten to match the interpreter behavior. > > > > > > No argument from me about that. > > > > I also think the traceback module should be corrected, and the test > > cases updated, despite the objections that it may break other > > people's doctest test cases.
Let me chime in with agreement (2.5 only of course). > I don't mind one way or the other, but with the number of people > working actively on the code at the moment, I think reverting broken > patches that don't have trivial test fixes is the way to go. The > buildbot system is useless, otherwise. That was the right thing to do (short of fixing all the missing tests, which requires actual thinking :-). -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
