Phillip J. Eby wrote: > How much any of that could have also applied to the distutils at one > time, I don't know. My point is merely that setuptools has enough > commercial value to make me believe that sponsorship for features > shouldn't be that hard to come by, and there are certainly worse things > I could do with my work days.
I'm glad to hear that you seem to be finding support for ongoing work on setuptools (I'm *really* glad to hear that; it's always good when people get funded to work on open source). I'm also happy to hear that Neal wants to study the complete source base of setuptools. Perhaps that means I won't have to :-) Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
