I was actually referring to the quality of the code. On 4/22/06, John J Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Fredrik Lundh wrote: > > Guido van Rossum wrote: > [...] > >> Python sorely lacks; but I've also heard from more than one person > >> that CPAN sucks from a quality perspective. So I think we shouldn't > [...] > > (as for the CPAN quality, any public repository will end up being full > > of crap; I don't see any way to work around that. automatic scoring > [...] > > I had assumed Guido was referring to the quality of the infrastructure, > including CPAN.pm, rather than the quality of the code stored in CPAN. > > I've certainly heard at least two people complain about the usability and > reliability of the CPAN infrastructure recently, and recall I found it > rather unfriendly myself. But that was around 5 years ago; I may simply > be wrong or out of date. > > > John > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org >
-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
