On 4/24/06, A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 12:30:12PM -0400, Alan McIntyre wrote: > > My unglamorous proposal is to review bugs & patches (starting with the > > oldest) and resolve at least 200 of them. Is that too much? Too few? > > I'll fix as many as possible during the SoC time frame, but I wanted to > > set a realistically achievable minimum for the proposal. If anybody can > > offer helpful feedback on a good minimum number I'd appreciate it. > > I'd suggest 75 or maybe 100 bugs or patches, not 200.
I agee with Andrew. There's not that much low hanging fruit. People review the old stuff from time to time. There are a lot of really hard bugs to fix. I guess there are also a lot that we can't reproduce and the submitter is MIA. Those might be easier. Ping them if not reproducible, if no response in a month, we close. n _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
