Greg Ewing wrote:
> I've been thinking about the terms "guarded context"
> and "context guard". We could say that the with-statement
> executes its body in a guarded context (an abstract
> notion, not a concrete object). To do this, it creates
> a context guard (a concrete object) with __enter__
> and __exit__ methods that set up and tear down the
> guarded context. This seems clearer to me, since I
> can more readily visualise a "guard" object being
> specially commissioned to deal with one particular
> job (guarding a particular invocation of a context).
>
> With only one object, there wouldn't be a need for any more
> terms.
contrast and compare:
http://pyref.infogami.com/with
http://pyref.infogami.com/with-alt
http://pyref.infogami.com/with-guard
a distinct term for "whatever the __enter__ method returns" (i.e.
the thing assigned to the target list) would still be nice.
</F>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
