Greg Ewing wrote:
> Josiah Carlson wrote:
>> and am +0 on the double use below:
>>
>> for x in y:
>> for x in z:
>
> Can anyone think of a plausible use case for that?
This really seems more like the domain of pychecker/pylint rather than the
compiler. The code may be a bad idea, but I don't see any reason to make it a
syntax error.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
