[/F]
>> so, which one is correct ?
>>
>> Python 2.4.3
>> >>> "".replace("", "a")
>> ''
>> >>> u"".replace(u"", u"a")
>> u'a'
[Greg Ewing]
> Probably there shouldn't be any "correct" in this case,
> i.e. the result of replacing an empty string should be
> undefined (because any string contains infinitely many
> empty substrings).
Where are they? For a string s, I count s[0:0], s[1:1], ...,
s[len(s):len(s)], or len(s)+1 empty substrings in all.
While str and unicode `replace` currently disagree about that when
len(s)==0, they agree when len(s)>0:
>>> " ".replace("", "A")
'A A'
>>> u" ".replace("", "A")
u'A A'
> +0 on raising an exception if you try.
I'd be +1, except the idea that there are len(s)+1 empty substrings in
a string is pretty much ubiquitous:
>>> "" in ""
True
>>> u"" in u""
True
>>> "".index("")
0
>>> u"".index(u"")
0
>>> " ".rindex("")
1
>>> u" ".rindex(u"")
1
>>> "".count("")
1
>>> u"".count(u"")
1
>>> " ".count("")
2
>>> u" ".count(u"")
2
So the current str.replace really is an oddball.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
