On 5/29/06, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Terry Reedy wrote: > >> .. _contributor agreement: > >> http://www.python.org/psf/contrib-form-python.html > > > > By itself, this link is inadequate since there is a blank for 'Initial > > License' with no choices indicated. So the summary needs a link to an > > instruction page also. The form is also a bit confusing since it appears > > to talk about future contributions but the last line tacked on to the > > bottom refers to the past. If it means both, then why not say so in the > > main text in a way that non-lawyers can understand? > > That's the modified version of the form for people like me that have > contributed stuff before sending the form in (I have one sitting on my desk > that will be going in the mail real soon now, honest. . .). > > There's another page somewhere in the PSF section that talks about contributor > agreements in general - maybe that would be a better link for the summary?
Sounds like it. (That wasn't anywhere in the thread.) Does http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/ seem like the right page to link to? Thanks, STeVe -- Grammar am for people who can't think for myself. --- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
