On 5/29/06, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>
> > well, the empty string is a valid substring of all possible strings
> > (there are no "null" strings in Python). you get the same behaviour
> > from slicing, the "in" operator, "replace" (this was discussed on the
> > list last week), "count", etc.
>
> Although Tim pointed out that replace() only regards
> n+1 empty strings as existing in a string of lenth
> n. So for consistency, find() should only find them
> in those places, too.
And "abc".count("") should return 4.
--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
