Michele Simionato wrote: > Neal Norwitz <nnorwitz <at> gmail.com> writes: >> >> > I wonder whether a check shouldn't just return (co_flags & 0x20), which >> > is CO_GENERATOR. >> >> Makes more sense. > > Okay, but my point is that the final user should not be expected to know > about those implementation details. The one obvious way to me is to have an > inspect.isgenerator, analogous to inspect.isfunction, inspect.ismethod, etc. > The typical use case is in writing a documentation/debugging tool. Now I > was writing a decorator that needed to discriminate in the case it was > decorating a regular function versus a generator.
I'd say, go ahead and write a patch including docs, and I think there's no problem with accepting it (as long as it comes before beta1). Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
